Viewing as
Standard 1302.102

School readiness goals

Seven measurable goals covering all five central domains of the framework, tracked at all three checkpoints and crosswalked to what the receiving districts expect at kindergarten entry.

45 CFR 1302.102(a) · (b)
The requirement. Every program must establish specific, measurable school readiness goals aligned to the Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework, to state early learning standards, and to the expectations of the schools the program's children will attend, then track progress toward them at least three times a year. A goal that cannot be measured from the program's own data is not a goal; it is a statement of intent.
5 of 5
Central domains with a measurable goal
all five covered
4 of 7
Goals met at the spring checkpoint
1 approaching · 2 not met
264
Children entering kindergarten next year
reported at item A.17
4
Receiving school districts
goals crosswalked to each

Every goal at every checkpoint

ages 4 to 5 · n = 260 at all three checkpoints
Central domainMeasurable goalTargetFallWinterSpringGapStatus
Approaches to Learning
Cognitive, Objective 11
80% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in positive approaches to learning by the spring checkpoint.80%52%70%81%+1 ppMet
Social and Emotional Development
Social-Emotional, Objectives 1-3
85% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in the Social-Emotional area by the spring checkpoint.85%60%78%84%−1 ppApproaching
Language and Literacy
Language, Objectives 8-10
85% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in the Language area by the spring checkpoint.85%55%69%82%−3 ppNot met
Language and Literacy
Literacy, Objectives 15-19
85% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in the Literacy area by the spring checkpoint.85%45%80%89%+4 ppMet
Cognition
Mathematics, Objectives 20-23
80% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in the Mathematics area by the spring checkpoint.80%46%72%88%+8 ppMet
Cognition
Cognitive, Objectives 11-14
85% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in the Cognitive area by the spring checkpoint.85%52%70%81%−4 ppNot met
Perceptual, Motor, and Physical Development
Physical, Objectives 4-7
90% of children will meet or exceed widely held expectations in the Physical area by the spring checkpoint.90%71%84%90%0 ppMet

Each goal is measured from the spring checkpoint over the 260 children aged 4 to 5 with a finalized checkpoint at all three points. A goal is met when the result reaches the target, approaching when it is within 2 percentage points, and not met beyond that. Two goals read from the same assessment area with different targets, which the crosswalk below explains.

Progress across the three checkpoints

share meeting expectations
30%48%65%83%100%Fall · Cognitive · 80% target: 52%Winter · Cognitive · 80% target: 70%Spring · Cognitive · 80% target: 81%Fall · Social-Emotional · 85% target: 60%Winter · Social-Emotional · 85% target: 78%Spring · Social-Emotional · 85% target: 84%Fall · Language · 85% target: 55%Winter · Language · 85% target: 69%Spring · Language · 85% target: 82%Fall · Literacy · 85% target: 45%Winter · Literacy · 85% target: 80%Spring · Literacy · 85% target: 89%Fall · Mathematics · 80% target: 46%Winter · Mathematics · 80% target: 72%Spring · Mathematics · 80% target: 88%Fall · Cognitive · 85% target: 52%Winter · Cognitive · 85% target: 70%Spring · Cognitive · 85% target: 81%Fall · Physical · 90% target: 71%Winter · Physical · 90% target: 84%Spring · Physical · 90% target: 90%FallWinterSpring
Cognitive · 80% targetSocial-Emotional · 85% targetLanguage · 85% targetLiteracy · 85% targetMathematics · 80% targetCognitive · 85% targetPhysical · 90% target

Every goal rose across the year. The distance still to travel is the chart beside this one, because a rising line that ends below its target is a missed goal, not a success.

Where each goal finished against its own target

percentage points
targetMathematicsMathematics: +8+8LiteracyLiteracy: +4+4CognitiveCognitive: +1+1PhysicalPhysical: 00Social-EmotionalSocial-Emotional: −1−1LanguageLanguage: −3−3CognitiveCognitive: −4−4

Language and Cognitive finished below target by more than 2 percentage points and carry an improvement plan.

How assessment areas map to the framework's central domains

the assessment system reports by its own areas; the framework is the required reporting frame
Central domainSubdomainsAssessment areas and objectives
Approaches to LearningEmotional and behavioral self-regulation · Cognitive self-regulation (executive functioning) · Initiative and curiosity · CreativityCognitive, Objective 11 (positive approaches to learning); Social-Emotional, Objective 1 (regulates own emotions and behaviors)
Social and Emotional DevelopmentRelationships with adults · Relationships with other children · Emotional functioning · Sense of identity and belongingSocial-Emotional, Objectives 1-3
Language and LiteracyAttending and understanding · Communicating and speaking · Vocabulary · Emergent literacyLanguage, Objectives 8-10; Literacy, Objectives 15-19
CognitionMathematics development · Scientific reasoningMathematics, Objectives 20-23; Cognitive, Objectives 11-14; Science and Technology
Perceptual, Motor, and Physical DevelopmentPerception · Gross motor · Fine motor · Health, safety, and nutritionPhysical, Objectives 4-7

The assessment system does not report by central domain. A program that reports its raw assessment areas is not reporting against the frame the standard names. The crosswalk is applied once in the data layer, so every view downstream of it is framework-native and the two goals that read from the Cognitive area are labelled by the domain each one belongs to.

Goals against receiving district kindergarten entry expectations

1302.102(a)(3)
Goal areaKindergarten entry expectationState assessment domainAlignment
LiteracyIdentifies at least 18 uppercase letters; produces beginning sounds for familiar wordsLanguage and LiteracyAligned
LanguageFollows two-step oral directions; uses complete sentences to describe an eventLanguage and LiteracyAligned
MathematicsCounts to 20; identifies numerals 0-10; compares sets by quantityMathematicsAligned
Social-EmotionalSeparates from caregiver without distress; sustains attention in group instruction for 10 minutes or moreSocial FoundationsAligned
Approaches to LearningPersists with a challenging task; transitions between activities with one promptSocial FoundationsAligned
PhysicalHolds a writing tool with a functional grasp; manages personal needs independentlyPhysical Well-Being and Motor DevelopmentPartial
Scientific ReasoningAsks questions about and describes observable properties of objects and living thingsCognitionNo goal

Kindergarten entry expectations are taken from each receiving district's published readiness criteria and the state entry assessment. Where a district expectation has no corresponding program goal it is surfaced as a gap rather than left unmapped, because an unmapped expectation is the specific alignment finding a federal reviewer looks for. Scientific Reasoning has no corresponding goal today.

Receiving districts

DistrictChildrenDisabilitiesTransition
Pelican Ridge Parish148
Bayou City61
Riverside Community44
East Ridge Charters20

Agreements to coordinate services for children with disabilities and to coordinate transition services are reported separately at items D.7.a and D.7.b. East Ridge Charter Collaborative has no transition agreement in effect, which requires an explanation at D.7 and carries an improvement plan.

Goals are stated for children aged 4 to 5, the cohort entering kindergarten. The three-year-old cohort is reported separately on the child assessment page, because a single figure across both age bands moves with the mix of ages rather than with what children learned. Results below ten children in a subgroup are suppressed. 436 children carry a finalized checkpoint at all three points out of 438 eligible.